Can you do an article about king Leopold and the Belgian Congo? Leftists always cry that the Belgians wanted to basically holocaust the Africans and that they cut off their hands because they were racist but never give an explanation on it. I’m having trouble finding any alternative viewpoints on it because my instincts are telling me it makes no sense for a European power to ethnically cleanse the population of a territory they possess in the first place. That and the fact that I know from studying history that Muslims are known to cut off the hands of criminals and were extremely cruel to their slaves compared to the West. The latter of which is heavily sensationalist and dramatic rather than being objective about it.
>that Muslims are known to cut off the hands of criminals
Unfortunately, this isnt really practiced much over there, i believe in saudi arabia (which is probably the most extreme muslim country in its interpretation of the laws) it has only been practiced 7 times since the formation of the country, but this could just be a deterrent I mean gulf arabs arent really known much for their crimes - probably due to the laws lol.
"But around 2006, the AJC corrected their previous population estimates for 1945-2005, but apparently, the Jewish population estimate for 1939 done in 1948 was just fine!"
There is no contradiction here. The following paragraph also fails to provide good evidence that the corrections were problematic. We have many sources on the fall in Evropa's Jewish population during WW2, see this:
Hey I'll type is there any way to find your old blog through internet archive or something I can't find your blog anywhere it's no longer online do you know any place where I can find if you archive websites or anything like that
I see, so you're ignoring 1930-1940 numbers, assuming prior fertility rates have no impact on total population going forward.
It is self-evident that it does. I didn't even imagine this needed to be mentioned that the fertility numbers should be considered over ~60 years, and that even averaging them is a kind of "napkin math" only viable when the magnitude of the case is overwhelming (which for this topic, it is).
That I don't have access to data prior to this is regrettable - however, I'm not the one saying some big exotic genocide happened.
Your use of the buzzword "baby boom" and poundy-fisty "basic sanity check" as you assert some imagined refutation that's actually an illusion of your mind-bending willful stupidity, is further evidence that you're not seeking reality but are an incorrigible believer in an event which you should, as an adult, be at first-pass extremely skeptical of given the unlikelihood of any genocide, let alone a hidden one using exotic killing methods that just so happen to be similar to lice removal protocols, and a body disposal method that is more expensive, conspicuous and primitive than what is used by Mexican cartels.
So I'm going to remove your comment, since your "criticism" is a kind of lie through willful ignorance (You wouldn't have failed to see something so obvious if you weren't seeking some sort of "debunk" - "this must be wrong, how is it wrong?"), and you appear to have bamboozled several readers that you made some sort of point. And I must block you as well, as you are clearly incorrigible, and I don't want to have to constantly manage you.
That's some nice sideline talk from someone who hasn't actually experienced idiot tard-wranglers who think they found something because they're too dumb and bigoted to actually read what's being said, or need things spoon-fed to them to a retarded degree.
You think I'm being petty and "cowardly" because you haven't seen this 1000 times. I used to be exactly like you in my thinking on this, "let everyone have a say" - the problem is that when 100 IQ people try to think and start reinforcing their social-proof stories, they miss details which are obvious to anyone with a functioning brain.
And now you're in a battle with a simple-wrong sub-narrative with a complex-correct narrative. And this happens over and over again - these characters don't do this once. They do it over and over again and imagine that they've "owned" all sorts of people. I can't stop them, but I can limit my participation in their circus.
So if you want to remove your head from your ass and read what was said about pre-1930 Jewish TFR, and figure out how TFR over time is actually calculated (it's not done by averaging the years, as a decline of say, 2% in 1920-1925 is not counter-balanced by a rise of say 2% in 1945), and show me how my conclusion of 1.73 on this basis is incorrect, then by all means, I'll look at your revised number.
But simply blurting out "2.80 in 1955" or whatever, and then buzz-wording "baby boom", is addressing something already baked into my calculation. Jewish TFR of the current living Jews, assumed lifespan of 80 (generous), is as HIGH as 1.73 precisely because of those high TFR periods mentioned in the supposed "criticism".
If you think letting a thousand flowers bloom when making intricate arguments on an (actually) controversial topic is going to do anything other than get you stuck in a pile of shit wrestling pigs, then go make your own shabang and do it. Show, don't tell.
This isn't a response to my article at all, since you're referring to earlier numbers and just taking them as true.
What I'm saying is that the later numbers cannot be true given Jewish fertility from an ~11 million 1945 population. To preserve the holocaust, you MUST accept the truthfulness of whatever agencies are involved in counting Jews (otherwise you're just cherry-picking when to believe and when not to, the "make your own holocaust" fallacy).
Basically, my conclusion is, based on later numbers and Jewish fertility, the 1945 numbers are NOT true, which your comment, which rests on 1945 numbers and 1959 at the latest, don't deal with at all.
There's no Jewish population momentum in the USSR. And yes, the "baby boom" is duly factored into the US TFR from 1930 to 1970. Without the baby boom US Jewish TFR would be even lower.
That's somewhat interesting. I don't think you get to replacement over the whole period, nor would we expect that momentum to carry all the way to 1972, but maybe the relevant period TFR for the USSR is higher than I thought.
Well that's another big problem, is Jews hiding themselves, or being hidden by Soviet Census. We basically have to trust the censuses for these states.
Many Jews in Russia Russify their names to blend into the native population to subvert it. Many members of the communist party were jews, crypto jews, or had jewish spouses. Such examples of the three are Trotsky, Lenin, and Stalin. Plus many Russian jews immigrated to Palestine to help establish Israel. The idf has its roots from Soviet jews that were members of the Cheka which explains their brutality to this day towards the Palestinians.
I’m saying jews falsely assimilate on purpose by using their White passing appearance to subvert their gentile hosts as a survival mechanism.
The point about the brutality of the Cheka was that it was purely sadistic even by Old Testament and antiquity’s standards.
European populations have been subverted by jewish led social and political movements namely Marxism via the Frankfurt school to destroy their natural instincts. Plus the power of the mass media to shape public opinion is a very powerful weapon. Just look at its effectiveness on pushing the covid vaccines and lockdowns despite said proved they were pointless.
Jews like Finkelstein only promote anti Zionism as optics so that the diaspora can remain safe in times of trouble. It’s why many jews in the west are anti Zionist because they rather just camouflage themselves among the gentiles and remain undetected whilst they continue to parasite off of their host country.
Can you do an article about king Leopold and the Belgian Congo? Leftists always cry that the Belgians wanted to basically holocaust the Africans and that they cut off their hands because they were racist but never give an explanation on it. I’m having trouble finding any alternative viewpoints on it because my instincts are telling me it makes no sense for a European power to ethnically cleanse the population of a territory they possess in the first place. That and the fact that I know from studying history that Muslims are known to cut off the hands of criminals and were extremely cruel to their slaves compared to the West. The latter of which is heavily sensationalist and dramatic rather than being objective about it.
>that Muslims are known to cut off the hands of criminals
Unfortunately, this isnt really practiced much over there, i believe in saudi arabia (which is probably the most extreme muslim country in its interpretation of the laws) it has only been practiced 7 times since the formation of the country, but this could just be a deterrent I mean gulf arabs arent really known much for their crimes - probably due to the laws lol.
Ryan has an amazing video on the subject.
Very interesting. I also wonder if the size of German reparations are tied to jewish population estimates.
"But around 2006, the AJC corrected their previous population estimates for 1945-2005, but apparently, the Jewish population estimate for 1939 done in 1948 was just fine!"
There is no contradiction here. The following paragraph also fails to provide good evidence that the corrections were problematic. We have many sources on the fall in Evropa's Jewish population during WW2, see this:
https://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2020/04/the-number-of-jews-in-europe-at-eve-of.html
The jews should all be on an island isolated from the rest of us so they can’t cause anymore harm.
come back
Jews have historically maintained an extraordinarily high TFR, actually.
This is how the Ashkenazim went from a few hundred to a few million in just five centuries.
Ryan, as a 14-year fan of your work, I strongly recommend this article to you: https://bronzeagepervert.substack.com/p/race-in-america-and-the-dork-right
come back
Hey I'll type is there any way to find your old blog through internet archive or something I can't find your blog anywhere it's no longer online do you know any place where I can find if you archive websites or anything like that
I see, so you're ignoring 1930-1940 numbers, assuming prior fertility rates have no impact on total population going forward.
It is self-evident that it does. I didn't even imagine this needed to be mentioned that the fertility numbers should be considered over ~60 years, and that even averaging them is a kind of "napkin math" only viable when the magnitude of the case is overwhelming (which for this topic, it is).
That I don't have access to data prior to this is regrettable - however, I'm not the one saying some big exotic genocide happened.
Your use of the buzzword "baby boom" and poundy-fisty "basic sanity check" as you assert some imagined refutation that's actually an illusion of your mind-bending willful stupidity, is further evidence that you're not seeking reality but are an incorrigible believer in an event which you should, as an adult, be at first-pass extremely skeptical of given the unlikelihood of any genocide, let alone a hidden one using exotic killing methods that just so happen to be similar to lice removal protocols, and a body disposal method that is more expensive, conspicuous and primitive than what is used by Mexican cartels.
So I'm going to remove your comment, since your "criticism" is a kind of lie through willful ignorance (You wouldn't have failed to see something so obvious if you weren't seeking some sort of "debunk" - "this must be wrong, how is it wrong?"), and you appear to have bamboozled several readers that you made some sort of point. And I must block you as well, as you are clearly incorrigible, and I don't want to have to constantly manage you.
Lol do you always delete comments that prove you wrong? What a pathetic coward.
That's some nice sideline talk from someone who hasn't actually experienced idiot tard-wranglers who think they found something because they're too dumb and bigoted to actually read what's being said, or need things spoon-fed to them to a retarded degree.
You think I'm being petty and "cowardly" because you haven't seen this 1000 times. I used to be exactly like you in my thinking on this, "let everyone have a say" - the problem is that when 100 IQ people try to think and start reinforcing their social-proof stories, they miss details which are obvious to anyone with a functioning brain.
And now you're in a battle with a simple-wrong sub-narrative with a complex-correct narrative. And this happens over and over again - these characters don't do this once. They do it over and over again and imagine that they've "owned" all sorts of people. I can't stop them, but I can limit my participation in their circus.
So if you want to remove your head from your ass and read what was said about pre-1930 Jewish TFR, and figure out how TFR over time is actually calculated (it's not done by averaging the years, as a decline of say, 2% in 1920-1925 is not counter-balanced by a rise of say 2% in 1945), and show me how my conclusion of 1.73 on this basis is incorrect, then by all means, I'll look at your revised number.
But simply blurting out "2.80 in 1955" or whatever, and then buzz-wording "baby boom", is addressing something already baked into my calculation. Jewish TFR of the current living Jews, assumed lifespan of 80 (generous), is as HIGH as 1.73 precisely because of those high TFR periods mentioned in the supposed "criticism".
If you think letting a thousand flowers bloom when making intricate arguments on an (actually) controversial topic is going to do anything other than get you stuck in a pile of shit wrestling pigs, then go make your own shabang and do it. Show, don't tell.
This isn't a response to my article at all, since you're referring to earlier numbers and just taking them as true.
What I'm saying is that the later numbers cannot be true given Jewish fertility from an ~11 million 1945 population. To preserve the holocaust, you MUST accept the truthfulness of whatever agencies are involved in counting Jews (otherwise you're just cherry-picking when to believe and when not to, the "make your own holocaust" fallacy).
Basically, my conclusion is, based on later numbers and Jewish fertility, the 1945 numbers are NOT true, which your comment, which rests on 1945 numbers and 1959 at the latest, don't deal with at all.
There's no Jewish population momentum in the USSR. And yes, the "baby boom" is duly factored into the US TFR from 1930 to 1970. Without the baby boom US Jewish TFR would be even lower.
That's somewhat interesting. I don't think you get to replacement over the whole period, nor would we expect that momentum to carry all the way to 1972, but maybe the relevant period TFR for the USSR is higher than I thought.
Well that's another big problem, is Jews hiding themselves, or being hidden by Soviet Census. We basically have to trust the censuses for these states.
Many Jews in Russia Russify their names to blend into the native population to subvert it. Many members of the communist party were jews, crypto jews, or had jewish spouses. Such examples of the three are Trotsky, Lenin, and Stalin. Plus many Russian jews immigrated to Palestine to help establish Israel. The idf has its roots from Soviet jews that were members of the Cheka which explains their brutality to this day towards the Palestinians.
this is the first time ive heard of stalin being jewish i thought he was a georgian of ossetian origin? Wasnt he somewhat anti semitic?
tbf georgians are literally viewed in the same vein as blacks in the eyes of russians
I’m saying jews falsely assimilate on purpose by using their White passing appearance to subvert their gentile hosts as a survival mechanism.
The point about the brutality of the Cheka was that it was purely sadistic even by Old Testament and antiquity’s standards.
European populations have been subverted by jewish led social and political movements namely Marxism via the Frankfurt school to destroy their natural instincts. Plus the power of the mass media to shape public opinion is a very powerful weapon. Just look at its effectiveness on pushing the covid vaccines and lockdowns despite said proved they were pointless.
Jews like Finkelstein only promote anti Zionism as optics so that the diaspora can remain safe in times of trouble. It’s why many jews in the west are anti Zionist because they rather just camouflage themselves among the gentiles and remain undetected whilst they continue to parasite off of their host country.